Find hidden real-estate
value before the market.
Aquier aggregates public data, public records, land registry, permit history and market references, and computes accelerated development strategies on top of it. It runs on public data, not proprietary feeds, which is exactly how a Netherlands-built engine scores US deals. Every opportunity scored on return, risk and financeability.
How much financing do you need?
Your LTV and financing need, in one second. Full financeability (costs, exit, DSCR) is in the report.
Every score is traceable to its source.
What we do: aggregate public data and compute development strategies in minutes. Built in the Netherlands and engineered for any market, the same public-data engine works wherever we operate, now live for US deal flow. No black box: you see the method and the data behind every number, which is what makes it bank-ready.
Listings + public records are gathered and normalised per object.
Rule-based scoring: deal, risk, financeability, fully traceable, no black box.
Valuations cross-checked against broker/appraiser data; missing data is flagged, never guessed.
Bank-ready output with sources and an auditable rationale per score.
Cost and financeability figures are calibrated on a bank-accepted development cost model and cross-validated against public construction-cost references (2025). We work in ranges, not false precision. Validation runs via a bank-reviewed source model plus external benchmarks, traceable per figure; we do not claim an independent third-party audit. A score is a forward-looking screening, not a record of realised returns. We give no guarantees; the developer or investor stays responsible for execution.
A redacted example of a stichtingskostenopzet (development cost model) of the type used in real financing applications. Anonymised, figures fall within our calibrated bands, source per line.
| Line | Source | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Acquisition | Residual · CBS land price | € 1.180.000 |
| Buyer's costs | Transfer tax + notary | € 135.000 |
| Construction | Market 2025 band | € 2.520.000 |
| Other costs | Advisory, permit, contingency | € 302.000 |
| Financing | Arrangement fee | € 50.000 |
| Total development cost | € 4.187.000 | |
Real reports from real projects.
A preview of the acquisition-intelligence reports behind our track record, anonymised (type + region, no addresses).
First page free, full report by email or login.
Depth per deal, not a headline number.
We don't lead with a large national count. Every score runs on real cost, interest and return bands, each figure triangulated across three independent sources, shown as a range, never false precision.
| Class | Deal score | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| A | ≥ 85 | Investment-grade. Scores on every axis at once. |
| B | 72 t/m 84 | Solid, one or two axes still need work. |
| C | below 72 | Falls outside the acquisition filter. |
How the score is built
| Yield (BAR / NAR) | Validated against the bank-reviewed model: BAR 10,6 to 13,0%, NAR 9,7 to 11,5%. |
| Development margin | Checked against the 12 to 25% band realistic for NL developers. |
| Permit probability | Modelled per municipality from permit history and zoning. |
| Location and risk | Transit, amenities and demand weighed against build cost, vacancy and exit. |
KANSENRADAR-elite = elite score ≥ 70 and opportunity score ≥ 60: only opportunities that score on multiple axes at once.
Bank-accepted cost model (Stiko) →
A real stichtingskostenopzet used in an actual financing application, the structural backbone of our cost & return figures.
Multi-party transformation budget →
A church-to-housing conversion with several independent contractor budgets for the same work, real price spread, not one quote.
Realized contractor cost split
Actual structural-works breakdown (steel/ruwbouw ≈61%, labour ≈20%, timber ≈15%) + payment-term schedule.
Practitioner band + 2025 benchmark
Calibration band (NL 2024–2026) cross-validated against a public 2025 construction-cost benchmark.
Validation is a forward-looking screening calibrated on real, bank-reviewed and externally cross-checked sources. It is not a record of realised client returns and not an independent third-party audit.
Clear boundaries build trust.
- Investment or financial advice, you and your committee keep the decision.
- A return guarantee, a score is a forward-looking screening, not a promise.
- A due-diligence replacement, every figure is a flag to investigate, not a conclusion.
- A backtested track record we don't have, we show the method and the data, not invented results.
- A bank-grade screening: cost, risk and financeability calibrated on a bank-accepted model.
- Traceable to the source, you see the data and the rationale behind every number.
- Honest about ranges and uncertainty instead of false precision.
- Faster triage so your scarce hours go only to deals that earn them.